system areas reviewed
Code, data, integrations and operations are mapped as one working platform.
Modernize legacy platforms through staged migration.
We review the current system, define the target architecture, plan migration stages and support cutover and stabilization within an agreed scope.
What Bayna Studio delivers.
The engagement covers the current system, the target design, the migration sequence and the controlled switch to an accepted platform state.
migration states controlled
The current, parallel and cutover states each have named checks and owners.
documents handed over
System map, dependencies, target decision, sequence, cutover record and accepted state.
cutover controls recorded
Scope, owner, acceptance checks, stop condition and rollback procedure.
We map code, data,
integrations and operations.
The review connects components, data paths, interfaces, deployment environments and responsible owners so the migration plan matches the system that actually runs.
Code relationships
Identify coupling, ownership and the components that cannot be moved independently.
What we inspect before recommending a migration.
Technology follows the migration requirements. We inspect the existing platform, then compare compatibility, support lifetime, security, operational fit, team capability and total ownership cost.
See the technologies we useRepositories and deployment records
Source structure, build files, scheduled jobs and release history show which components change and deploy together.
Used for the component inventorySchemas and data flows
Stores, transformations, read and write paths, retention rules and ownership show what must remain consistent.
Used for the data dependency mapInterfaces and integration schedules
API specifications, file transfers, protocols, schedules and failure behavior show where systems depend on each other.
Used for the integration registerEnvironment, incident and owner records
Runtime configuration, deployment history, incidents, change windows and owner input define the operating limits.
Used for cutover and rollback planningHow we move the platform.
We document the current system, select a target boundary, split the work into migration increments and verify each state before the next switch.
See the migration stagesInventory the current platform
Record components, data movement, integrations, environments, constraints and responsible owners.
Output: current-state system mapDesign the target architecture
Decide what stays, what separates, what becomes compatible and what must be replaced.
Output: target decision and incrementsMigrate and verify in stages
Implement each increment, run the agreed checks, control cutover and document the accepted state.
Output: cutover and handoff recordDocuments your technical team receives.
Each stage produces a working record that another engineer or decision owner can review and continue from.
System view
Components, data movement, integrations, infrastructure and known operating constraints.
Dependency register
Relationships that determine what can move independently and what must remain compatible.
Architecture decision
The selected boundary, alternatives considered, technical reason and responsible decision owner.
Migration sequence
Defined increments, prerequisites, checks and the condition for moving to the next state.
Cutover and rollback record
The switch window, acceptance checks, stop condition and route back to a known state.
Accepted platform state
What changed, what remains, who owns the state and what the next decision depends on.
How we verify the result.
Before work starts, the client and Bayna Studio record the baseline, target, measurement window and evidence source. The same fields are checked after acceptance.
MeasureBeforeAfterEvidence
Run cost
Hosting, licences and recorded support effort
Stable cost after the agreed stage
Invoices, contracts, support recordsRelease friction
Lead time and deployment frequency
The same measures after acceptance
Delivery and deployment recordsRecovery
Incident and rollback time
Observed recovery to an agreed state
Incident timeline, acceptance checksCutover exposure
Planned interruption and rollback condition
The observed event and final state
Cutover log, signed acceptanceWhat clients ask before a system review.
The exact answer depends on the platform, but the service boundary is clear before technical access begins.
Does modernization mean replacing the whole system?
No. We compare staged extraction, compatibility work, parallel operation, partial replacement and a full rewrite against the dependency map.
Can the current platform stay in operation?
The review identifies what must remain live, the available change window and the rollback condition. Those facts determine whether parallel operation is possible.
What is needed before technical access?
Define the platform area in scope, the known operating constraint, the decision owners and the acceptance criteria. Access remains limited to the written scope.
Does Bayna Studio implement the migration?
Implementation and stabilization can be included in the agreed scope. Indefinite operations and managed support are separate responsibilities and are not assumed.
How are savings or improvements reported?
We compare the recorded baseline with the accepted state over an agreed measurement window. Results are published only when the supporting records and client approval are available.
Who supplies what during the engagement.
Bayna Studio delivers
The system review, dependency register, target architecture, migration sequence and agreed implementation, cutover and handoff work.
Your organization provides
Scoped access, existing technical records, operating constraints, responsible owners and acceptance criteria for each stage.
Tell us what runs now, what must change and what cannot stop.
Submit a technical enquiry